A widely repeated figure for the emerald ring in this film is $300,000. The company that actually made it lists it at $144,000. That gap — one number an outside jeweller's estimate, the other the maker's own price — is the most useful fact about this film's jewellery, and nobody seems to have checked it.
Meanwhile the film's other ring, the silver one, has been officially reissued at $160 and is currently available in exactly two sizes.
Below: both rings, both verified against the makers' own data today, and why the film made them different metals on purpose.
Silver and gold are the argument
The costume design here is unusually legible, because the metals are doing the class commentary.
Costume designer Katina Danabassis described the director's brief to The Zoe Report: the intent was "kind of like showing the different levels in society there." Silver is the matchmaker's metal. Gold is the wealthy suitor's.
Once you see it, the film's jewellery stops being decoration and becomes the plot. The woman who arranges other people's marriages wears a small silver ring with three heart charms. The man who can buy anything wears a one-off emerald in 18K yellow gold. Neither is an accident.
The silver ring: officially reissued at $160
This is the one you can actually buy, and the reissue is unusually well documented.
A24 sells it directly, and their own product copy names the maker:
"Sterling silver ring with three heart-shaped charms, as worn by Adore's star matchmaker, Lucy. Made in Los Angeles by our friends at fine jewelry label, J. Hannah."
A studio commissioning a real fine-jewellery house to reproduce a screen piece is rare. Most film merchandise is a licensed approximation; this is the object remade by a named LA label.
Stock, checked 10 August 2026 against the store's live inventory:
| Size | Price | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | $160 | Sold out |
| 6 | $160 | In stock |
| 7 | $160 | In stock |
| 8 | $160 | Sold out |
Two sizes left out of four. If yours is 6 or 7, that is the window.
One caveat we want to be precise about. The original screen ring is widely described as a thrift-store find. That description comes from press reporting rather than from the costume designer directly — we could not find her saying it in her own words, so treat it as reported rather than confirmed. What is confirmed is that A24 commissioned the reissue from J. Hannah.
Shipping: A24's own shipping policy states they ship to the UK and EU through a partner service. Canada and Australia are not addressed in that policy, so we are not going to tell you it ships there — check before ordering.
Not at the maker's own shop. We searched J. Hannah's site for this ring and found nothing: it is an A24 exclusive. Their own heart-motif pieces run $475 to $680, and every one we checked is sold out.
The gold ring: the number everyone quotes is wrong
Here is the part that matters.
The emerald ring is real, it is one of a kind, and its maker is Darius Jewels. Their own product data describes it precisely:
"One Of A Kind Emerald Ziggurat Ring featuring a 5.10 ct Colombian Emerald set in 18K Yellow Gold."
Their listed price is $144,000, and it is sold.
Now compare that to the figure in circulation. A UK jewellery retailer's creative director published an estimate — "I'd estimate Pedro's ring to be worth around $300,000" — in a blog post that has been picked up and repeated widely.
| Source | Figure |
|---|---|
| Outside retailer's estimate | $300,000 |
| The maker's own listed price | $144,000 |
The estimate is more than double the actual price. Both numbers are honestly labelled at their source — the retailer says "I'd estimate" — but the estimate is what travelled, and it travelled without the maker's number next to it.
This is the pattern we exist to catch. A plausible-sounding figure from someone in the industry gets treated as a valuation, then gets cited as fact. Anyone can check the maker's own listing in about thirty seconds, and almost nobody does.
It is worth understanding why an outside estimate would run high, because the mechanism is not dishonesty. A jeweller pricing an unfamiliar ring from screen footage has to guess at the stone: a 5.10 carat Colombian emerald spans an enormous price range depending on origin certification, clarity, oil treatment and colour saturation. Guess at the top of that range and you land near three hundred thousand. The maker, who knows exactly what stone it is, priced it at $144,000. When the person who made the object and a person estimating from a screenshot disagree, the maker wins.
There is a second reason this matters for readers rather than just for accuracy. Inflated figures change how people feel about what they saw. A film specifically about the gap between what people want and what they can afford does not need its central luxury object exaggerated by a factor of two — the real number is already far beyond almost everyone, and it is the real number.
If you cannot have it
For the silver ring: if your size is gone, the design is genuinely simple — a slim sterling band with three heart charms. Charm rings in that idiom exist across the price spectrum, and this is one of the rare screen pieces where the concept transfers cleanly to a cheaper object. What you would be paying A24 for is the exact reissue and the connection to the film.
For the gold ring: the specific stone is sold and was always one of a kind, so there is no route to it at any price. But the maker's ziggurat setting is a house design, and other pieces in it are available:
| Piece | Price | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Emerald Ziggurat Eternity Band | $24,000 | In stock |
| Diamond Ziggurat Eternity Band | $28,000 | In stock |
Still serious money, and an order of magnitude below the one-off. If what you responded to was the architecture of the setting rather than the stone, that is where it lives.
And the honest framing. This is a film about what people can and cannot afford, in which the cheap ring is the one with feeling attached and the expensive one is a transaction. The $160 reissue is not a consolation version of the $144,000 ring. In the film's own terms it is the other argument.
FAQ
How much is the emerald ring in Materialists? The maker, Darius Jewels, lists it at $144,000 — a one-of-a-kind 5.10ct Colombian emerald in 18K yellow gold. It is sold. A widely repeated $300,000 figure is an outside retailer's estimate, not the maker's price.
Can I buy Lucy's silver ring? Yes. A24 sells an official reissue made by LA fine-jewellery label J. Hannah at $160. As of 10 August 2026 only sizes 6 and 7 are in stock; 5 and 8 are sold out.
Who made the silver ring? J. Hannah, commissioned by A24. It is not sold on J. Hannah's own site — it is an A24 exclusive.
Was the original ring thrifted? That is reported rather than confirmed. We could not find the costume designer saying it in her own words, so we are flagging it as unverified.
Why is one ring silver and the other gold? Deliberate class signalling. The costume designer described the brief as showing "the different levels in society" — silver for the matchmaker, gold for the wealthy suitor.
Does A24 ship internationally? Their policy states they ship to the UK and EU via a partner. Canada and Australia are not covered in that policy, so confirm before ordering.
Is there any way to get the emerald ring? Not that ring — it was one of a kind and is sold. The same maker's ziggurat setting is available as eternity bands at $24,000 (emerald) and $28,000 (diamond).
Why do the price figures differ so much? One is an estimate offered by a jeweller who did not make the ring; the other is the maker's own listed price. Both are honestly labelled at source, but only the estimate got repeated.